ILB is an initiative of GLC & Partners

HomeTagResolution Professional Archives - Indian Law Blog

** This blog was co-published as a news item on https://legaldesire.com/insolvency-process-can-continue-despite-assets-of-corporate-debtor-being-attached-by-ed/ The case for the Applicant Resolution Professional was argued by one of our members – Counsel Krishna Grandhi of GLC & Partners. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad Bench, has delivered an important ruling impacting several ongoing tussles between the Prevention of Money...

The Insolvency and bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Amendment, 2018 has been brought into force on 6th June 2018, which has been regarded as one of the most prominent and substantive amendment to the code till now. This amendment seeks out to remove the loopholes which ought to reduce the efficiency of the Code and also to...

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the case of JK Jute Mill Mazdoor Morcha vs. Juggilal Kamlapal Jute Mills Co. Ltd. [ Civil Appeal No. 20978 of 2017] answered whether a trade union can be said to be an ‘Operational Creditor’ for the purpose of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”). The case came up in...

In the case of M/S Innoventive Industries Pvt. Ltd vs. ICICI Bank & Anr { CIVIL APPEAL No. 8337-8338 of 2017], the Hon’ble Supreme Court for the first time explained the paradigm shift in the law by virtue of the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”) which consolidates and amends all the insolvency...

In the case of Brilliant Alloys Private Limited Vs. Mr. S. Rajagopal & Others [Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 31557/2018], the Hon’ble Supreme Court allowed the withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) after the issuance of the invitation for expression of interest. The appeal...

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) gives power to the Adjudicating Authority (“AA”) under Section 30 of the IBC to accept or reject the approved Resolution Plan (“RP”) on few grounds. In the case of K. Sashidhar vs Indian Overseas Bank & Ors (Civil Appeal No.10673 OF 2018), the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed a common...

From the time the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) came into force, there has been some ambiguity regarding the differentiation of a creditor as a Financial Creditor (“FC”) or as an Operational Creditor (“OC”) and the constitutional validity of such differential treatment. As per Section 5A of the IBC, a Financial Creditor  “means any...

The moratorium period under Section 14 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) talks about various proceedings and transactions that are given a pause while Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) is in process. The rationale behind such prohibition is to let the negotiations take place without any restriction which might occur due to destruction...

In the case of Sandeep Kumar Gupta Resolution Professional Vs. Stewarts & Lloyds of India Ltd. & Anr. (Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 263 of 2017), the Appellant was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional, in the Respondent’s (Corporate Debtor) Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, on the recommendation of the Corporate Debtor. While he was an...

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) came into force with three main objectives, i.e., “promote entrepreneurship, availability of credit and balance the interests of all the stakeholders”. To achieve and balance all three objectives, it is important that the Resolution Plan (“RP”) accepted by the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) caters to the need of...